Monday, March 9, 2009

Jobs: Another 651,000 Lost in February

February payroll and unemployment data came in pretty much as anticipated. The Labor Dept. reported Friday in its Payroll Survey that the U.S. economy shed 651,000 jobs for the month. In the separate Household Survey, the unemployment rate rose half a percent, to 8.1%.

Revisions to January and December cropped an additional 161,000 jobs. Cumulative jobs lost since the current recession began in December 2007 stand at about 4.4 million, with much of that loss (2.6 million jobs) occurring in the past four months.

At 8.1%, the unemployment rate now exceeds the peak from the 1991 recession, 7.8% in June of 1992, and is at a 25-year high. During the recession of the early 1980s, the unemployment rate was greater than 8% for 26 months, from November 1981 through January 1984. From September 1982 through June of 1983 (10 months), the rate was greater than 10%, peaking at 10.8% in November and December of 1982.

Unemployment claims remain high, but did unexpectedly decline last week. For the week ending February 28, the seasonally adjusted initial claims for unemployment was 639,000, a decrease of 31,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 670,000, the Labor Dept. reported Thursday. The four-week moving average was 641,750, up 2,000 from last week.

Saturday, February 28, 2009

NFL, Make-A-Wish Foundation® Granting All-Pro Wishes for 12 Kids to Attend Super Bowl XLIII

http://www.wish.org/news/news_releases/super_bowl_09

The Make-A-Wish Foundation and the NFL had partnered together to give a dozen young children who have serious medical conditions the opportunity to attend the Super Bowl Feb, 1. They received a "welcome home" party sponsered by TGI Fridays, a meet-and-greet with past and present NFL players, as well as testing their abilities to play football-oriented games. The dozen children were selected from all over the US.

Monday, February 16, 2009

High-Roller Resort, Chilly Climate

by Laura Landro

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123456725718686069.html? 

This was interesting to see how a very popular resort such as Atlantis is suffering in todays economy and what they are trying to do to pull them selves through.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Obama's Stimulus Act: Good For Government, Bad For the Economy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mKE16Exh9k

Obama adviser: Auto industry must restructure

By TOM KRISHER AND KEN THOMAS


WASHINGTON
The Obama administration faces difficult choices on the fate of the U.S. auto industry, weighing the cost of pouring billions more into struggling companies against possible bankruptcies that could undermine plans to jump-start the U.S. economy.
General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC are racing against a Tuesday deadline to submit plans to the government to show how they can repay billions in government loans and return to viability despite a sharp decline in auto sales.
The terms of the federal loans set "targets" for concessions, largely from debt-holders and the United Auto Workers union, but concession talks have made little progress with just a couple of days left before the initial deadline.
Negotiations between GM and the UAW broke off Friday night but were to resume Sunday, still focusing on exchanging the company's cash payments into a union-run retiree health care trust for GM stock, according to a person briefed on the talks who did not want to be identified because the bargaining is private.
GM and UAW officials declined comment.
GM and Chrysler do not need to have everything nailed down for Tuesday's progress reports, but the companies are expected to detail concessions along with plant closures, the potential elimination of brands and thousands of job cuts.
After Tuesday there will be several weeks of intense negotiations ahead of a March 31 deadline for the final versions of the plans.
Detroit-based GM and Auburn Hills, Michigan-based Chrysler are living off a combined $13.4 billion in government loans. If they do not receive concessions by March 31, they face the prospect of having the loans pulled, followed by bankruptcy proceedings.
Any bankruptcy would be particularly painful with some economists predicting the country could lose 2 million to 3 million jobs this year and the unemployment rate, now 7.6 percent, could swell past 9 percent by the spring of 2010.
In network interviews Sunday, White House senior adviser David Axelrod did not respond directly when asked if the U.S. economy could withstand a GM bankruptcy. Nor did he directly address a question about whether the Obama administration would let GM go into bankruptcy.
"I'm not going to prejudge anything. I think that there is going to have to be a restructuring of those companies. I'm not going to get into the mode of how that happens. We'll wait and see what they have to say on Tuesday," he told "Fox News Sunday."
Executives at the two automakers have said bankruptcy is not an option because consumers would not buy cars from a company that might go out of business.
"How that restructuring comes is something that has to be determined," Axelrod said. "But it's going to be something that's going to require sacrifice not just from the auto workers but also from creditors, from shareholders and the executives who run the company. And everyone's going to have to get together here to build companies that can compete in the future."
Harley Shaiken, a University of California-Berkeley labor economist who has studied the automakers, does not think the Obama administration would run the risk of bankruptcies given its efforts to create jobs.
"We're clearly on the edge of that abyss right now. Going over it would do irreparable damage not simply to the auto industry but to the manufacturing base in this country," Shaiken said.
Under the GM and Chrysler loan terms, both companies have "targets" to reduce debt and labor costs. One target says the automakers need to convert half of their payments into a health care trust fund for retirees in stock rather than cash, reducing their debt. Another requires the companies to reduce their unsecured debt by two-thirds by persuading investors to swap the debt for equity in the companies.
In 2007 contract talks, the union agreed to take on retiree health care to help the companies remove billions in liabilities from their books. But the contracts only require the company to pay the union 60 percent of the liability, Shaiken said. If half those payments come in risky stock, the trust fund may not have enough money, he said.
According to others briefed on the talks, bargaining has shifted to Ford Motor Co., the healthiest of the Detroit Three and the only one not receiving government loans. Ford is seeking the same concessions as GM and Chrysler so it is not placed at a disadvantage.
Another complication is that Obama has not yet appointed an overseer of the plans -- a so-called "auto czar" -- and many industry officials have said the lack of an administration point-person has slowed the discussions. Steven Rattner, a private equity investor, and Stephen Girsky, a veteran auto industry analyst, have been mentioned as leading contenders to be part of an Obama auto team.
Sen. Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat, said Thursday that he did not expect the reports Tuesday to provide "very specific information because there's no car czar. I do think there will be an outline of directions."
Axelrod would not say whether the administration would offer the auto industry more bailout money. GM already has borrowed $9.4 billion to stay in business, and it would receive an addition $4 billion if the Treasury Department approves its viability plan. Chrysler wants $3 billion more on top of the $4 billion it has already borrowed.
"We need to see what it is that they come up with this week," he said.

Senate passes $787 billion stimulus bill

By Jeanne Sahadi, CNNMoney.com senior writer

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- It's a done deal. Still controversial, but a done deal.

The Senate on Friday evening passed the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which was drawn up, amended and negotiated in record time.

The bill got 60 votes -- the minimum it needed to pass. Three Republicans -- Sens. Susan Collins, R-Me., Arlen Specter, R-Pa., and Olympia Snowe, R-Me. -- voted for it. Earlier in the day, no Republicans in the House voted for the legislation, which nevertheless passed 246 to 183, with just 7 Democrats voting against it.

President Barack Obama will sign the recently approved economic stimulus bill on Tuesday in Denver, Colorado, two senior administration officials told CNN.

Both officials cited a desire of Obama's to get out of Washington -- to go, in the words of one official, "out west in an area hit hard economically, away from the politics of Washington." The other official described Denver as "a place that will see the benefits of the bill in hiring workers."

"The goal at the heart of this plan is to create jobs. Not just any jobs, but jobs doing the work America needs done: repairing our infrastructure, modernizing our schools and hospitals, and promoting the clean, alternative energy sources that will help us finally declare independence from foreign oil," President Obama said Friday morning.

The Obama economic team estimates the stimulus plan will create or save between 3 million and 4 million jobs.

"We've done something today that's transformational for the nation," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in a press conference after the House vote.

During the House floor debate earlier on Friday, House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey, D-Wisc., characterized the bill as "the largest change in domestic policy since the 1930s."

Republican discontent

The bill's final passage would represent far less than the bipartisan victory Obama had hoped for weeks ago, a hope he tabled as it became clear that Republicans and some fiscally conservative Democrats were adamantly opposed to the size and contents of the bill.

Republican critics believe there are more targeted and effective ways to create jobs than the measures in the bill, including more spending on infrastructure and more tax relief.

They frequently cite the tag line to describe what Democrats have often said makes stimulus measures effective -- that they be timely, targeted and temporary. "This bill fails on all three points," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said Friday.

In the House, Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., blasted the bill as misguided.

"Republicans are not about saying 'No' but about saying 'Yes' to solutions that put Americans back to work," Pence said. "[This legislation] will not grow our economy. It will grow our government."

And they frequently cite the burden of such an expensive package on the country's record high deficit and the burden that will place on the next generation.

In response to Republican critics, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., cited provisions in it that will help families facing job loss, education expenses and mortgage troubles.

"Consider the impact on the next generation if their parents lose a job ... if their home is foreclosed upon ... if they're forced out of college because their parents can't pay the bills," Durbin said.

Democrats have also countered the Republicans' debt argument by noting that record deficit levels were achieved as a result of borrowing to pay for the cost of the Iraq war and to finance a series of tax cuts -- both decisions made during a Republican administration.

The compromise bill was crafted after intensive negotiations in recent days between the House, Senate and White House, although Republicans said repeatedly they felt excluded from the process. And on Friday, several said they did not think it was fair that they were being asked to vote on a 1,000-page-plus bill that was posted online only late Thursday night.

How the bill breaks down

The package devotes $308.3 billion -- or 39% -- to appropriations spending, according to the Congressional Budget Office. That includes $120 billion on infrastructure and science and more than $30 billion on energy-related infrastructure projects, according to key congressional committees.

It devotes another $267 billion -- or 34% -- on direct spending, including increased unemployment benefits and food stamps, CBO said.

And it provides $212 billion -- or 27% -- for tax breaks for individuals and businesses, although the biggest piece of that is for individuals. (Here's a quick breakdown of those breaks.)

Depending on how tax measures are categorized, the percentage of the bill devoted to tax relief is 35%, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

Unlike the CBO, the committee counts all portions of tax credits that are refundable. A refundable credit is one that may be paid to tax filers even if the credit exceeds a tax filer's liability. In other words, it is money the government needs to spend. The CBO, by contrast, treats that money as an outlay.

Republicans have advocated for more tax relief in the bill -- they wanted at least 40% -- and they often oppose tax credits going to those who pay less in income tax than they receive in refunds.

Democrats counter that the lowest-income families do pay money into the system by way of payroll tax for Social Security and through sales taxes. And they note that it is those low-income families most likely to quickly spend any tax relief they get, thereby making it more stimulative for the economy.

What it can - and can't do

For months, economists -- both liberal and conservative -- have urged lawmakers to act quickly to help stem the economic downturn. They argue that while tax cuts can be put out more quickly than infrastructure spending, they may not be as stimulative as spending because tax filers are likely to save at least a portion of what they receive.

There also has been debate over how large the total package should be. Many economists think it should be larger -- to help combat what is expected to be a $2 trillion shortfall in the country's output this year and next. But at this point, though they're not enamored with every provision in the bill -- they say it's necessary to do something.

Proponents of the bill aren't promising the economic recovery package will be a panacea for the economy. "No one thinks this is the answer," said House Majority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md.

But, they say, it's needed to stem the downturn and ease the financial strains hurting Americans. Indeed, Obama's economic team last month said they expect that the unemployment rate likely will go up in the near term but having a stimulus package could bring it down to around 7% by the end of 2010. That's slightly below the rate of 7.6% today.

Friday, February 13, 2009

Wal-Mart closing Ga return center



NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) is closing its return center in Georgia and laying off all 400 employees, in the second job cuts the retailer disclosed this week.
The Macon facility is one of six return centers that Wal-Mart operates across the U.S. to handle merchandise that is returned, defective or recalled.
The facility has been open for 15 years and has become too small to process all of the goods that are shipped to it, Wal-Mart spokesman Greg Rossiter said.
Wal-Mart will now ship the goods to a third-party contractor in South Carolina, said Rossiter, who declined to identify the contractor.
Wal-Mart filed its plans with the Georgia Labor Department this week, saying the Macon facility will close in mid-September, giving employees a long lead time to try to find new jobs.
Employees will have the opportunity to apply for positions at Wal-Mart stores and Sam's Clubs in the area, Rossiter said.
Wal-Mart on Tuesday disclosed that it is cutting 700 to 800 positions at its corporate headquarters in Bentonville, Ark., as the retailer realigns certain business areas.
Rossiter said the moves in Bentonville and Macon were unrelated and declined to discuss whether the retailer planned more layoffs at other facilities.
Wal-Mart is considering outsourcing business processes to India in contracts worth $300 million to $500 million, the Economic Times has reported.
When discussing the cuts at Wal-Mart's headquarters, a spokesman said the company will create thousands of jobs this year at the store level.
Wal-Mart on Tuesday is expected to post fourth-quarter earnings lower than a year ago, reflecting impacts from the poor economy, higher expenses and a stronger dollar.
Wal-Mart's results should still be better than its peers', "thanks to its low- price advantage, healthy trade-down momentum, and a much improved apparel offering that focuses on brands that matter," said Todd Slater, retail analyst at Lazard Capital Markets.
Wal-Mart shares recently were down $1.47, or 3.1%, to $46.65.
-By Karen Talley, Dow Jones Newswire

Businesses Fight to Stay Open in Tough Economy

www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AuimxLpKm0

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Chasing the Rabbit....

His concept seems quite simplistic...companies need to operate with a sense of URGENCY. What other concepts did he talk about that you think should be highlighted? Please COMMENT on this video. Thanks, Kelly